Our fourth engagement, although not our most popular speaker, made for an enjoyable light-hearted evening. A majority of patrons seemed to think that Richard Roeper wasn’t on the same level as our other speakers this season and although I tend to agree, I’m not sure who could have filled the slot following Dr. Rice and not fallen flat by comparison. I appreciated where Mr. Roeper was coming from; he didn’t take himself too seriously and he definitely had me laughing through the whole day (even before the engagement).The following illustrates how patrons felt about the Richard Roeper engagement:
(1=Low/5=High)
Lecture: 3.2
Q&A: 3.8
Moderator: 4.1
Lighting: 4.1
Acoustics: 3.7
Overall: 3.4
53% of audience polled felt the engagement was "money well spent".
51% of audience polled felt the night met their expectations.
Comments from our patrons:
“Mr. Roeper must have an IQ above 180 with broad interests and obviously high energy. His humor and varied background helped to make him a lively and informative speaker. I agree with his criteria for a good movie and enjoyed his quick wit and sometimes "smart ass" comments. Delightful.”
“He has a great sense of humor and I enjoyed that - though his presentation was a bit weak. Enjoyable but not memorable.”
“Although not a topic in which I was particularly interested, it is good to hear speakers from a variety of areas. Mr. Roeper was amusing and certainly knowledgeable about his profession.”

Our second engagement of the season also proved to be very successful. As is to be expected with a political speaker, some of our patron feedback displayed discontent with Gergen and his viewpoints. However, most of our patrons who didn’t necessarily agree with his political stance on certain issues nevertheless enjoyed him as a very engaging speaker.


